White people are so uncomfortable talking about race, that even using the word “white” in a conversation ignites a defensive and visceral reaction. And no, reverse racism isn’t a thing, in case that’s where you are headed next.
I am writing this piece after a conversation with an acquaintance of mine who inquired about my recent trip to Kansas. My response included the word “white” in reference to both the demographics as well as the lack of diversity. And this followed suit:
“I’m not trying to start a fight, I just never understand why people point out skin color. If I described a place as a ‘black people everywhere’ I would be construed as a racist. So I should point out skin color when talking? “I was talking to this black guy today” or “some asshole asian cut me off in traffic today”. I just don’t understand how it adds to the discussion.”
If you understand privilege, you accept that there are places you cannot be and language you cannot use. It also means acknowledging you benefit off a system designed to maintain barriers to racial equality. While I am not arguing against other factions of intersecting oppressions, I am arguing that as a white person race, is not a factor and that merit alone did not get us where we are today. That truth is so fundamentally abstract to most, that even the slightest inclination of suggesting that the power of privilege has significantly contributed to one’s economic position, is viewed as both outlandish and insulting. The exhaustive and circular conversation usually ends with, “why does everything have to be political with you, it’s not always about race”. And you know what, he isn’t wrong, it’s not always about race, because he gets to CHOOSE when it is.
Short of asking him to open a history textbook or read primary documents, I will attempt to scratch the surface of his temperament. First, we must begin by confronting the definitions of racism so that when people decide that racism is just prejudice, we can challenge that notion by acknowledging that in doing so we single-handedly ignore the lived experience of every person of color in this country. However, if we agree that there are structural and systemic faucets in place that adversely impact communities of color socially, politically and economically – then, and only then, we can move the conversation forward. So yes, white people, your language has consequences, and the historical implications of using inflammatory language, or ignoring racism altogether, directly impacts custom and policy which perpetuate racism. It is language and ideologies steeped in white supremacy and carried out in microaggressions that undoubtedly contribute to Denver Public Schools being more segregated now than they were prior to Brown v. Board, why Flint Michigan still doesn’t have clean water, and why, despite Batson v. Kentucky, racial disparities in incarceration are the highest in the world.
Privilege is understanding that you get to decide when race matters, and just because it makes you feel uncomfortable in the realization that perhaps you aren’t wholeheartedly deserving of your socioeconomic position, that merit alone is not why you are where you are – that doesn’t negate your direct contribution to a system designed to maintain racial inequality in this country.

As the National Anthem blared in the background, I found myself paralyzed in deep contemplation. After watching America Divided earlier in the day, I sat there as the song rang loudly over the speaker and thought how this song is defined by other people in America. And I found myself asking, how would the people in Flint Michigan define this song, the victims of hurricane Katrina, the students of Pinellas county, the residents of the NYC still facing discriminatory housing practices, the occupants of the south side of Chicago, ex-factory workers in Detroit or the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe? I want to know how this America, the America we stamped as expendable – would define this anthem?